Independent Ethics Consultant; Research Associate at Ethox, University of Oxford
Sir Cyril Herman Hinshelwood, 1956 winner of the Nobel prize in Chemistry, described science as “an imaginative adventure of the mind, seeking truth in a world of mystery”. But what happens to science when scientists give more weight to their imagination than their evidence?
Nearly 200 years ago, Charles Babbage (inventor of the first mechanical computer) described ‘cooking’ and ‘trimming’ of data as almost routine abuses of science. In modern times, research malpractice is more common than we might think. Sheehan’s 2007 study revealed that 40% of US clinical scientists were aware of scientific misconduct they had not reported (Clev Clin J Med 74: S63-7.) And even Nobel laureates have come under suspicion.
I recount three recent stories of malpractice in life sciences to consider the boundary between what is acceptable and unacceptable, and how good scientists get tempted into bad practice.
Host: Jonas Bergquist
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.